Wiki Edit Review

National Park followed in Manuel Antonio's footsteps and did flinch when I added content. I am going to venture to say that my edits were not ballsy enough or they were just thoroughly researched. ( I am hoping for the later.) The Melbourne article only axed my contribution to the After checking the history of all my articles I feel that I made contributions appealing to, or unobtrusive, to the wiki community as they were hardly ever even mentioned. In the Manuel Antonio article, I made a fair number of the additions since last September. Only one other individual had reoccurring additions. My best bet is that it is a US retiree spending his lazy mornings in the towns bustling Internet cafe/town hub. Hempfield High School and Corcovado grammar "errors". It turns out that I am not as familiar with Australian English as I had previously thought. I will definitely remember "transport", "favourite", and "centre" from now on.
All in all it seems, as I have previously stated above, that my article additions were pretty mild and did not cause much commotion among fellow editors. Even though my impact was fairly small to the wiki community, I am proud that I now know how to actively edit and contribute to share my experiential knowledge to the world...or maybe just with our class. :)